Cook v. First National Bank

Supreme Court of Georgia

Cook v. First National Bank

172 S.E. 32, 177 Ga. 898, 1933 Ga. LEXIS 463

Supreme Court of Georgia·Decided December 15, 1933·No. No. 9602·Published

Opinion

Bell, J.

1. “There is no provision of law for reviewing by writ of error an interlocutory order merely revoking or setting aside a temporary restraining order.” Carolina Portland dement Co. v. Jones, 162 Ga. 591 (134 S. E. 300) ; Barrett v. American Securities Co., 173 Ga. 57 (159 S. E. 866).

2. The only exception in this case is to an order dissolving a previous restraining order, and therefore the motion to dismiss the writ of error must be sustained.

[899]*899No. 9602. December 15, 1933. H. Cliff Hatcher and Fleming & Fleming, for plaintiff. Fullbright & Burney, for defendant.

Writ of error dismissed.

All the Justices concur, except Sill, J., absent for providential cause.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Bell, J.

1. “There is no provision of law for reviewing by writ of error an interlocutory order merely revoking or setting aside a temporary restraining order.” Carolina Portland dement Co. v. Jones, 162 Ga. 591 (134 S. E. 300) ; Barrett v. American Securities Co., 173 Ga. 57 (159 S. E. 866).

2. The only exception in this case is to an order dissolving a previous restraining order, and therefore the motion to dismiss the writ of error must be sustained.

[899]*899No. 9602. December 15, 1933. H. Cliff Hatcher and Fleming & Fleming, for plaintiff. Fullbright & Burney, for defendant.

Writ of error dismissed.

All the Justices concur, except Sill, J., absent for providential cause.

Cook v. First National Bank, 172 S.E. 32, 177 Ga. 898, 1933 Ga. LEXIS 463 (Ga. 1933).

Pincite

172 S.E. 32 (Cook v. First National Bank) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related