Cook v. Fernandina Seafood Co.

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Cook v. Fernandina Seafood Co.

149 So. 3d 1209, 2014 Fla. App. LEXIS 18160, 2014 WL 5769097

District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided November 6, 2014·No. No. 1D14-4349·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The Court has determined that the Amended Partial Pinal Judgment is not a final order because it fails to fully resolve the claim for specific performance and contemplates the exercise of further judicial labor. Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed. The Court declines to relinquish jurisdiction as requested by the appellants in their response to the Court’s October 1, 2014, order. See Demont v. Demont, 24 So.3d 699 (Fla. 1st DCA 2009) (dismissing appeal rather than allowing lower court to enter a final order where an indeterminate amount of judicial labor remained to be done before a final order could be entered).

PADOVANO, WETHERELL, and SWANSON, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

The Court has determined that the Amended Partial Pinal Judgment is not a final order because it fails to fully resolve the claim for specific performance and contemplates the exercise of further judicial labor. Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed. The Court declines to relinquish jurisdiction as requested by the appellants in their response to the Court’s October 1, 2014, order. See Demont v. Demont, 24 So.3d 699 (Fla. 1st DCA 2009) (dismissing appeal rather than allowing lower court to enter a final order where an indeterminate amount of judicial labor remained to be done before a final order could be entered).

PADOVANO, WETHERELL, and SWANSON, JJ., concur.

Cook v. Fernandina Seafood Co., 149 So. 3d 1209, 2014 Fla. App. LEXIS 18160, 2014 WL 5769097 (Fla. Ct. App. 2014).

Pincite

149 So. 3d 1209 (Cook v. Fernandina Seafood Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related