Cook v. Darling

35 Mass. 393
CourtMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
DecidedOctober 12, 1836
StatusPublished

This text of 35 Mass. 393 (Cook v. Darling) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Cook v. Darling, 35 Mass. 393 (Mass. 1836).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The Court are of opinion that the plea in bar is bad, and that the judgment declared on, cannot thus be impeached collaterally, by plea- The judgment declared on, is a domestic judgment, of a court of common law jurisdiction, to which a writ of error lies, to reverse the judgment, if erroneous. But until reversed it must be taken to be conclusive.

A different rule may prevail in regard to decrees and adjudications oi inferior courts, not proceeding according to the course of the common law. If they exceed their jurisdiction, or proceed contrary to law, the proceeding is void, and this may be shown by plea ; but the principal reason is, because no writ of error lies to reverse such judgment. Smith v. Rice 11 Mass. R. 514.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
35 Mass. 393, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/cook-v-darling-mass-1836.