Cook v. Court of Common Pleas
12 A.3d 291, 608 Pa. 428, 2011 Pa. LEXIS 112
Opinion
ORDER
AND NOW, this 14th day of January, 2011, the Petition for Extraordinary Relief and the Application to Expedite are DISMISSED. See Commonwealth v. Reid, 537 Pa. 167, 642 *429 A.2d 453 (1994) (hybrid representation not permitted). The Prothonotary is directed to forward the filings to counsel of record. Additionally, the Prothonotary is directed to strike the jurist’s name from the caption.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cook v. Court of Common Pleas, 12 A.3d 291, 608 Pa. 428, 2011 Pa. LEXIS 112 (Pa. 2011).
12 A.3d 291 (Cook v. Court of Common Pleas) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Commonwealth v. Reid
642 A.2d 453 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1994)
Williams v. Williams
429 A.2d 450 (Supreme Court of Rhode Island, 1981)