Cook v. Cook

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Cook v. Cook

558 So. 2d 1084, 1990 Fla. App. LEXIS 1935, 1990 WL 35443

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Cook v. Cook. Read the opinion of the Court — 574 So. 2d 281 →

District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided March 22, 1990·No. No. 89-0489·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We affirm the order of the trial court modifying custody. The appellant has failed to demonstrate an abuse of discretion. Notwithstanding appellee’s heavy burden, there is sufficient evidence in the record to support the court’s findings, both as to the best interests of the children and a substantial change in circumstances. The award of attorney’s fees is also affirmed.

STONE, WARNER and POLEN, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

We affirm the order of the trial court modifying custody. The appellant has failed to demonstrate an abuse of discretion. Notwithstanding appellee’s heavy burden, there is sufficient evidence in the record to support the court’s findings, both as to the best interests of the children and a substantial change in circumstances. The award of attorney’s fees is also affirmed.

STONE, WARNER and POLEN, JJ., concur.

Cook v. Cook, 558 So. 2d 1084, 1990 Fla. App. LEXIS 1935, 1990 WL 35443 (Fla. Ct. App. 1990).

Pincite

558 So. 2d 1084 (Cook v. Cook) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.