Cook v. Commissioner of Social Security Administration

Fourth Circuit

Cook v. Commissioner of Social Security Administration

671 F. App'x 123

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided December 6, 2016·No. No. 15-2494·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Meredith Cook appeals the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and upholding the Commissioner’s denial of her application for supplemental security income. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Cook v. Colvin, No. 6:14-cv-01294-JMC, 2015 WL 5783562 (D.S.C. Sept. 30, 2015). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Meredith Cook appeals the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and upholding the Commissioner’s denial of her application for supplemental security income. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Cook v. Colvin, No. 6:14-cv-01294-JMC, 2015 WL 5783562 (D.S.C. Sept. 30, 2015). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Cook v. Commissioner of Social Security Administration, 671 F. App'x 123 (4th Cir. 2016).

Pincite

671 F. App'x 123 (Cook v. Commissioner of Social Security Administration) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related