Cook v. Collins

122 S.W. 654, 92 Ark. 291, 1909 Ark. LEXIS 305
CourtSupreme Court of Arkansas
DecidedNovember 15, 1909
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 122 S.W. 654 (Cook v. Collins) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Arkansas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Cook v. Collins, 122 S.W. 654, 92 Ark. 291, 1909 Ark. LEXIS 305 (Ark. 1909).

Opinion

Battle, J.

On -the 8th day of April, 1905, J. C. Crabtree executed a deed of trust, and thereby conveyed certain personal property in trust, to W. W. Shaver to secure the payment of two promissory notes, one for the sum of $840, dated the 8th day of April, 1905, payable to M. Collins, J. B. Hamilton and J. W. Cook, and the other for $122, payable to the order of J. W. Cook, and due May 8, 1905; and provided, if the notes were not paid on or before the 8th day of May, 1905, the trustee should be authorized to sell the property at public sale to the highest bidder for cash, and appropriate the proceeds of the sale, first, to the cost of executing the trust, -and, second, the aforesaid notes, and the balance, if any, pay to Crabtree. Shaver failing to act, J. C. Harrell became trustee by the terms of the deed, and sold the property according to the terms of the deed for $787.50, which is insufficient to pay -both notes. Parties differ as to .how it shall be divided, and appeal to the court to decide. The chancery court decreed that it shall be appropriated to the páyment of the noté for $840, afid any remaining thereafter to the other note; and Cook appealed.

The proceeds of the sale should be applied, first, to the payment of the cost of executing the trust, and the remainder should be appropriated pro rata in part payment of the two notes. Penzel v. Brookmire, 51 Ark. 105.

The decree of the chancery court is reversed, and the cause is remanded with directions to the court to render a decree in accordance with this opinion.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Pearson v. Scott
269 S.W. 370 (Supreme Court of Arkansas, 1925)
Kissire v. Plunkett-Jarrell Grocer Co.
145 S.W. 567 (Supreme Court of Arkansas, 1912)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
122 S.W. 654, 92 Ark. 291, 1909 Ark. LEXIS 305, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/cook-v-collins-ark-1909.