Cook v. City of Menasha

70 N.W. 289, 95 Wis. 215, 1897 Wisc. LEXIS 170
Wisconsin Supreme Court·Decided February 2, 1897·Published·Cited by 6 cases

Opinion

Maeshall, J.

On the 18th day of December, 1895, the defendant, by its attorney, on thy hearing of a motion duly made for that purpose, obtained an order bringing in other [216]*216parties as defendants. On the 16th day of January, 1896, a motion on. the part of plaintiffs was duly brought on for á hearing before the court, for an order vacating the order of December, 18, 1895. Such motion to vacate was denied, and an order accordingly entered from which the plaintiffs appealed. This case is ruled by Smith v. Scott, 93 Wis. 453, where this court held that such orders are not appeal-able, under ch. 212, Laws of 1895. Therefore this appeal must be dismissed for want of jurisdiction to entertain it.

By the Court.— The appeal is dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cook v. City of Menasha, 70 N.W. 289, 95 Wis. 215, 1897 Wisc. LEXIS 170 (Wis. 1897).

70 N.W. 289 (Cook v. City of Menasha) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Lund v. Holbrook
62 N.W.2d 112 (Nebraska Supreme Court, 1954)
Jones v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.
245 N.W. 650 (Wisconsin Supreme Court, 1932)
Schroeder v. Arcade Theater Co.
184 N.W. 542 (Wisconsin Supreme Court, 1921)
Schmuhl v. Milwaukee Electric Railway & Light Co.
146 N.W. 787 (Wisconsin Supreme Court, 1914)
Wechselberg v. Michleson
81 N.W. 657 (Wisconsin Supreme Court, 1900)
National Distilling Co. v. Seidel
79 N.W. 744 (Wisconsin Supreme Court, 1899)