Cook v. Chicago, Burlington & Quincy Railway Co.

193 Ill. App. 527
CourtAppellate Court of Illinois
DecidedApril 16, 1915
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 193 Ill. App. 527 (Cook v. Chicago, Burlington & Quincy Railway Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Court of Illinois primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Cook v. Chicago, Burlington & Quincy Railway Co., 193 Ill. App. 527 (Ill. Ct. App. 1915).

Opinion

Mr. Presiding Justice Eldredge

delivered the opinion of the court.

5. Railroads, § 647*—when failure to warn not proximate cause of injury. The failure to sound warning signals upon the approach of a freight train slowly backing towards a public crossing is not the proximate cause of an injury to one attempting to drive over the crossing in front of the approaching train, where he had known for two blocks back that the train was approaching the crossing. 6. Railroads, § 678*—when contributory negligence to cross in front of approaching train. One who has knowledge of the approach of a freight train which is slowly backing towards a public crossing, not only as a result of his own observation but also because of warnings by a crossing flagman and by a brakeman on the next to the rear car, and attempts to cross, does not exercise due care, and is guilty of contributory negligence.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Urban v. Pere Marquette Railroad
266 Ill. App. 152 (Appellate Court of Illinois, 1930)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
193 Ill. App. 527, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/cook-v-chicago-burlington-quincy-railway-co-illappct-1915.