Cook v. Blair

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
DecidedNovember 20, 2003
Docket03-6534
StatusUnpublished

This text of Cook v. Blair (Cook v. Blair) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Cook v. Blair, (4th Cir. 2003).

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 03-6534

TERRY E. COOK,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

ELLEN BLAIR, Dr.,

Defendant - Appellee,

and

ARTHUR F. BEELER; MEDICAL STAFF, FMC Butner,

Defendants.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Terrence W. Boyle, Chief District Judge. (CA-02-609-5-BO)

Submitted: August 5, 2003 Decided: November 20, 2003

Before WIDENER, WILLIAMS, and KING, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Terry E. Cook, Appellant Pro Se. Rudolf A. Renfer, Jr., Assistant United States Attorney, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).

PER CURIAM:

Terry E. Cook appeals the district court’s order denying

relief on his action filed under Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents

of Fed. Bureau of Narcotics, 403 U.S. 388 (1971). We have reviewed

the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for

the reasons stated by the district court. See Cook v. Blair, No.

CA-02-609-5-BO (E.D.N.C. Mar. 25, 2003). We dispense with oral

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately

presented in the materials before the court and argument would not

aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Cook v. Blair, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/cook-v-blair-ca4-2003.