Cook v. Blair
This text of Cook v. Blair (Cook v. Blair) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 03-6534
TERRY E. COOK,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
ELLEN BLAIR, Dr.,
Defendant - Appellee,
and
ARTHUR F. BEELER; MEDICAL STAFF, FMC Butner,
Defendants.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Terrence W. Boyle, Chief District Judge. (CA-02-609-5-BO)
Submitted: August 5, 2003 Decided: November 20, 2003
Before WIDENER, WILLIAMS, and KING, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Terry E. Cook, Appellant Pro Se. Rudolf A. Renfer, Jr., Assistant United States Attorney, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM:
Terry E. Cook appeals the district court’s order denying
relief on his action filed under Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents
of Fed. Bureau of Narcotics, 403 U.S. 388 (1971). We have reviewed
the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for
the reasons stated by the district court. See Cook v. Blair, No.
CA-02-609-5-BO (E.D.N.C. Mar. 25, 2003). We dispense with oral
argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately
presented in the materials before the court and argument would not
aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Cook v. Blair, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/cook-v-blair-ca4-2003.