Cook v. American Family Life Assurance Co. of Columbus
500 So. 2d 1334, 1986 Ala. LEXIS 4274
Opinion
Because the contract between the parties, denoted “Associate’s Agreement,” contained an “at will” termination clause, and because Plaintiff alleges no public policy exception to our “at will” employment doctrine, we affirm the trial court’s order granting the Defendant’s motion to dismiss. Williams v. Killough, 474 So.2d 680 (Ala.1985); Self v. Bennett, 474 So.2d 673 (Ala.1985); Hinrichs v. Tranquilaire Hospital, 352 So.2d 1130 (Ala.1977); see, also, Jones v. Ethridge, 497 So.2d 1107 (Ala.1986).
AFFIRMED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cook v. American Family Life Assurance Co. of Columbus, 500 So. 2d 1334, 1986 Ala. LEXIS 4274 (Ala. 1986).
500 So. 2d 1334 (Cook v. American Family Life Assurance Co. of Columbus) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Jones v. Ethridge
497 So. 2d 1107 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1986)
Self v. Bennett
474 So. 2d 673 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1985)
Williams v. Killough
474 So. 2d 680 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1985)
Hinrichs v. Tranquilaire Hospital
352 So. 2d 1130 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1977)