Cook & Co. v. Black

Supreme Court of Iowa

Cook & Co. v. Black

7 N.W. 121, 54 Iowa 693

CourtSupreme Court of Iowa

DecidedOctober 22, 1880

StatusPublished

Cited by4 cases

This text of 7 N.W. 121 (Cook & Co. v. Black) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Iowa primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Cook & Co. v. Black, 7 N.W. 121, 54 Iowa 693 (iowa 1880).

Pincite

Opinion

Day, J.

i. lien: fund executors? intention of decedent. The plaintiffs allege that James A. Elliott agreed in parol with the plaintiffs that they might have a lien on a certain stock of cattle then owned by James Elliott to secure a sum due them, and that the cat- . , tie should be placed m the possession of some third person to take charge of and hold them until they were in a suitable condition to be sold. James A. Elliott was indebted to Cook & Co. in the sum of about $500, and to the City Bank of Boone about $2,600. He was the owner of fifty-five head of fat cattle. He frequently declared his purpose to be to pay Cook & Co. $300, and the City Bank of Boone all of its claim but $1,000, out of the proceeds of the cattle when they were sold.

Some time before his death James Elliott placed the cattle in the care of his son-in-law, D. W. Merchant, and his sons, Sylvester and Daniel Elliott, as herders. He made no declaration of trust, and they had no control of the cattle further than taking them to pasture. James Elliott'remained in control of the property, and paid for herding them.

In his will James Elliott made his sons, Sylvester and Daniel, his executors. As such executors they came into possession of the property after their father’s death. Pursuant to order of the probate court they sold these cattle at private sale for $2,388. It is the fund arising from this sale upon which plaintiffs claim a lien. .

[695]*695In onr opinion the evidence fails to establish the creation of a trust in the property, or to show the existence of facts entitling the plaintiffs to a lien upon the proceeds. The most that the evidence shows is an intention on the part of the debtor to apply the proceeds of the property to the payment in part of the debts due the plaintiffs. This intention was never consummated. It does not give the plaintiffs any precedence over the other creditors of the estate. The court erred in establishing a lien in favor of the plaintiffs.

Reversed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Day, J.

i. lien: fund executors? intention of decedent. The plaintiffs allege that James A. Elliott agreed in parol with the plaintiffs that they might have a lien on a certain stock of cattle then owned by James Elliott to secure a sum due them, and that the cat- . , tie should be placed m the possession of some third person to take charge of and hold them until they were in a suitable condition to be sold. James A. Elliott was indebted to Cook & Co. in the sum of about $500, and to the City Bank of Boone about $2,600. He was the owner of fifty-five head of fat cattle. He frequently declared his purpose to be to pay Cook & Co. $300, and the City Bank of Boone all of its claim but $1,000, out of the proceeds of the cattle when they were sold.

Some time before his death James Elliott placed the cattle in the care of his son-in-law, D. W. Merchant, and his sons, Sylvester and Daniel Elliott, as herders. He made no declaration of trust, and they had no control of the cattle further than taking them to pasture. James Elliott'remained in control of the property, and paid for herding them.

In his will James Elliott made his sons, Sylvester and Daniel, his executors. As such executors they came into possession of the property after their father’s death. Pursuant to order of the probate court they sold these cattle at private sale for $2,388. It is the fund arising from this sale upon which plaintiffs claim a lien. .

[695]*695In onr opinion the evidence fails to establish the creation of a trust in the property, or to show the existence of facts entitling the plaintiffs to a lien upon the proceeds. The most that the evidence shows is an intention on the part of the debtor to apply the proceeds of the property to the payment in part of the debts due the plaintiffs. This intention was never consummated. It does not give the plaintiffs any precedence over the other creditors of the estate. The court erred in establishing a lien in favor of the plaintiffs.

Reversed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

7 N.W. 121, 54 Iowa 693, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/cook-co-v-black-iowa-1880.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack