Coogan v. Interborough Rapid Transit Co.
This text of 103 N.Y.S. 1120 (Coogan v. Interborough Rapid Transit Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
We can discern no material difference between the facts as presented in this record and as presented at the first trial, which, as in the present case, resulted in a judgment for the plaintiff. The first judgment was reversed by this court, with an ■ opinion reviewing the evidence at considerable length. 50 Misc. Rep. 562, 99 N. Y. Supp. 382. The same condition, especially with respect to the question whether or not a warning- was given by the guard, exists in this record as appears by the opinion to have existed before. Judgment reversed, and new .trial ordered, with costs to the appellant to abide the event.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
103 N.Y.S. 1120, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/coogan-v-interborough-rapid-transit-co-nyappterm-1907.