Coogan v. Interborough Rapid Transit Co.

Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York

Coogan v. Interborough Rapid Transit Co.

103 N.Y.S. 1120

Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York·Decided April 10, 1907·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We can discern no material difference between the facts as presented in this record and as presented at the first trial, which, as in the present case, resulted in a judgment for the plaintiff. The first judgment was reversed by this court, with an ■ opinion reviewing the evidence at considerable length. 50 Misc. Rep. 562, 99 N. Y. Supp. 382. The same condition, especially with respect to the question whether or not a warning- was given by the guard, exists in this record as appears by the opinion to have existed before. Judgment reversed, and new .trial ordered, with costs to the appellant to abide the event.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

We can discern no material difference between the facts as presented in this record and as presented at the first trial, which, as in the present case, resulted in a judgment for the plaintiff. The first judgment was reversed by this court, with an ■ opinion reviewing the evidence at considerable length. 50 Misc. Rep. 562, 99 N. Y. Supp. 382. The same condition, especially with respect to the question whether or not a warning- was given by the guard, exists in this record as appears by the opinion to have existed before. Judgment reversed, and new .trial ordered, with costs to the appellant to abide the event.

Coogan v. Interborough Rapid Transit Co., 103 N.Y.S. 1120 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1907).

Pincite

103 N.Y.S. 1120 (Coogan v. Interborough Rapid Transit Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.