Coogan v. Amos H. Van Horn, Ltd.

52 N.J. Eq. 588

Supreme Court of New Jersey·Decided June 15, 1894·Published

Opinion

Pee Cueiam.

Order affirmed, for the reasons given in the court of chancery.

For affirmance — The Chief-Justice, Dixon, Gaeeison, Lippincott, Magüe, Eeed, Van Syckel, Bogeet, Beown, Geeen, Keuegee, Sims, Smith — 13.

For reversal — None.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Coogan v. Amos H. Van Horn, Ltd., 52 N.J. Eq. 588 (N.J. 1894).

Pincite

52 N.J. Eq. 588 (Coogan v. Amos H. Van Horn, Ltd.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.