Cooey v. Ohio

499 U.S. 954
Supreme Court of the United States·Decided April 1, 1991·No. No. 89-6482; No. 90-5414; No. 90-6444; No. 90-6913; No. 90-7016; No. 90-7134; No. 90-7199·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

Sup. Ct. Ohio;

Sup. Ct. La.;

Super. Ct. Pa.;

C. A. 8th Cir.;

C. A. 11th Cir.;

Sup. Ct. Cal.; and

Ct. Crim. App. Tex. Certiorari denied. Reported below: No. 89-6482, 46 Ohio St. 3d 20, 544 N. E. 2d 895; No. 90-5414, 559 So. 2d 1310; No. 90-6444, 395 Pa. Super. 649, 570 A. 2d 585; No. 90-6913, 923 F. 2d 860; No. 90-7016, 916 F. 2d 1507; No. 90-7134, 51 Cal. 3d 72, 793 P. 2d 23; No. 90-7199, 799 S. W. 2d 683.

Justice Marshall,

dissenting.

Adhering to my view that the death penalty is in all circumstances cruel and unusual punishment prohibited by the Eighth and Fourteenth Amendments, Gregg v. Georgia, 428 U. S. 153, 231 (1976), I would grant certiorari and vacate the death sentences in these cases.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cooey v. Ohio, 499 U.S. 954 (1991).

499 U.S. 954 (Cooey v. Ohio) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Cooey v. Anderson
988 F. Supp. 1066 (N.D. Ohio, 1997)