Conyngham v. Haffen

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Conyngham v. Haffen

95 N.Y.S. 1123

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedDecember 8, 1905

StatusPublished

This text of 95 N.Y.S. 1123 (Conyngham v. Haffen) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Conyngham v. Haffen, 95 N.Y.S. 1123 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1905).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CT RIAM.

The judgment appealed from should be modified, by affirming the same as to the defease designated in the answer as “a separatf defense,” and by reversing the judgment a id sustaining the demurrer, with costs, with ) ,ave to the defendant "to amend on payment of costs in the court below, as to the defense designated in the answer as “a further •defe'ise.” As so modified, judgment should be aflhmed, without costs of appeal to either party.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CT RIAM.

The judgment appealed from should be modified, by affirming the same as to the defease designated in the answer as “a separatf defense,” and by reversing the judgment a id sustaining the demurrer, with costs, with ) ,ave to the defendant "to amend on payment of costs in the court below, as to the defense designated in the answer as “a further •defe'ise.” As so modified, judgment should be aflhmed, without costs of appeal to either party.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

95 N.Y.S. 1123, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/conyngham-v-haffen-nyappdiv-1905.