Conyngham v. Commissioner

Third Circuit

Conyngham v. Commissioner

81 F.2d 1017, 17 A.F.T.R. (P-H) 462, 1936 U.S. App. LEXIS 3614

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit

DecidedFebruary 15, 1936

DocketNo. 5831

StatusPublished

This text of 81 F.2d 1017 (Conyngham v. Commissioner) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Conyngham v. Commissioner, 81 F.2d 1017, 17 A.F.T.R. (P-H) 462, 1936 U.S. App. LEXIS 3614 (3d Cir. 1936).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

After hearing and due consideration of the case, this court reached the same conclusion as the Circuit Court of Appeals of the Second Circuit in Robinson v. Commissioner, 80 F.(2d) 1018, where another owner of the property here concerned was the taxpayer. In view of the fact that the taxpayer in that case was then seeking to have that court rehear and reverse its decision, we deferred deciding the present case. As the Supreme Court in United States Trust Co. v. Anderson, 290 U.S. 683, 54 S.Ct. 120, 78 L.Ed. 589, has denied a certiorari in United States Trust Company v. Anderson (C.C.A.) 65 F.(2d) 575, 89 A.L.R. ,994, and as the Robinson Case was in line' with the Anderson Case, we now affirm the action of the Tax Board in the present case.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

After hearing and due consideration of the case, this court reached the same conclusion as the Circuit Court of Appeals of the Second Circuit in Robinson v. Commissioner, 80 F.(2d) 1018, where another owner of the property here concerned was the taxpayer. In view of the fact that the taxpayer in that case was then seeking to have that court rehear and reverse its decision, we deferred deciding the present case. As the Supreme Court in United States Trust Co. v. Anderson, 290 U.S. 683, 54 S.Ct. 120, 78 L.Ed. 589, has denied a certiorari in United States Trust Company v. Anderson (C.C.A.) 65 F.(2d) 575, 89 A.L.R. ,994, and as the Robinson Case was in line' with the Anderson Case, we now affirm the action of the Tax Board in the present case.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

81 F.2d 1017, 17 A.F.T.R. (P-H) 462, 1936 U.S. App. LEXIS 3614, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/conyngham-v-commissioner-ca3-1936.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack