Conyngham v. Commissioner

81 F.2d 1017, 17 A.F.T.R. (P-H) 462, 1936 U.S. App. LEXIS 3614
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit·Decided February 15, 1936·No. No. 5831·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

After hearing and due consideration of the case, this court reached the same conclusion as the Circuit Court of Appeals of the Second Circuit in Robinson v. Commissioner, 80 F.(2d) 1018, where another owner of the property here concerned was the taxpayer. In view of the fact that the taxpayer in that case was then seeking to have that court rehear and reverse its decision, we deferred deciding the present case. As the Supreme Court in United States Trust Co. v. Anderson, 290 U.S. 683, 54 S.Ct. 120, 78 L.Ed. 589, has denied a certiorari in United States Trust Company v. Anderson (C.C.A.) 65 F.(2d) 575, 89 A.L.R. ,994, and as the Robinson Case was in line' with the Anderson Case, we now affirm the action of the Tax Board in the present case.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Conyngham v. Commissioner, 81 F.2d 1017, 17 A.F.T.R. (P-H) 462, 1936 U.S. App. LEXIS 3614 (3d Cir. 1936).

81 F.2d 1017 (Conyngham v. Commissioner) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

United States Trust Co. of New York v. Anderson
65 F.2d 575 (Second Circuit, 1933)
Robinson v. Commissioner
80 F.2d 1018 (Second Circuit, 1935)
U.S. Trust Co. v. Anderson
290 U.S. 683 (Supreme Court, 1933)