Conyers v. Virginia Housing Development Authority

585 F. App'x 66
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided October 23, 2014·No. No. 14-1679·Published

Opinion

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Nicolle Conyers appeals the district court’s order denying relief on her “Motion for [Fed.R.Civ.P.] 60(b) to Remedy Fraud on the Court” and a second Rule 60 motion. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Conyers v. Va. Hous. Dev. Auth., No. 3:12-cv-00458-JRS (E.D. Va. June 24, 2014). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this, court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Conyers v. Virginia Housing Development Authority, 585 F. App'x 66 (4th Cir. 2014).

585 F. App'x 66 (Conyers v. Virginia Housing Development Authority) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.