Conyers v. State

623 So. 2d 871, 1993 Fla. App. LEXIS 9480, 1993 WL 366870
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Conyers v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 569 So. 2d 1360
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided September 22, 1993·No. No. 92-3543·Published

Opinion

BARFIELD, Judge.

The petitioner seeks a writ of common law certiorari to review an order of the circuit court dismissing the appeal of his conviction for driving under the influence (DUI). We find that, under the particular circumstances of this criminal case, dismissal of the appeal was too harsh a sanction and that the order therefore constitutes a departure from the essential requirements of law. See Krebs v. State, 588 So.2d 38 (Fla. 5th 1991), rev. denied, State v. Krebs, 599 So.2d 658 (Fla.1992). See also Kuznik v. State, 604 So.2d 37 (Fla. 2d DCA 1992); Hamilton v. State, 573 So.2d 109 (Fla. 4th DCA 1991).

The petition for writ of certiorari is GRANTED and the order dismissing the appeal is QUASHED.

BOOTH and ALLEN, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Conyers v. State, 623 So. 2d 871, 1993 Fla. App. LEXIS 9480, 1993 WL 366870 (Fla. Ct. App. 1993).

623 So. 2d 871 (Conyers v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Hamilton v. State
573 So. 2d 109 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1991)
Kuznik v. State
604 So. 2d 37 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1992)
Krebs v. State
588 So. 2d 38 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1991)