Conwell v. O'Brien

Indiana Supreme Court

Conwell v. O'Brien

11 Ind. 419

Indiana Supreme Court·Decided December 20, 1858·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The question presented by this case, is settled by Adamson v. The Auditor, &c., 9 Ind. R. 174. According to the agreed statement of facts, the tax was levied by the vote of the township. This could not be done. Had it been levied by the trustees after the vote, it [420] would have been good. That it was so levied, we cannot -infer from the statement in the record.

H. P. Biddle and B. W. Peters, for the appellant. N. O. Ross and R. P. Effinger, for the appellee.

The judgment is affirmed with costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

The question presented by this case, is settled by Adamson v. The Auditor, &c., 9 Ind. R. 174. According to the agreed statement of facts, the tax was levied by the vote of the township. This could not be done. Had it been levied by the trustees after the vote, it [420] would have been good. That it was so levied, we cannot -infer from the statement in the record.

H. P. Biddle and B. W. Peters, for the appellant. N. O. Ross and R. P. Effinger, for the appellee.

The judgment is affirmed with costs.

Conwell v. O'Brien, 11 Ind. 419 (Ind. 1858).

Pincite

11 Ind. 419 (Conwell v. O'Brien) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related