Conwell v. O'Brien

Indiana Supreme Court

Conwell v. O'Brien

11 Ind. 419

CourtIndiana Supreme Court

DecidedDecember 20, 1858

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 11 Ind. 419 (Conwell v. O'Brien) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Indiana Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Conwell v. O'Brien, 11 Ind. 419 (Ind. 1858).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The question presented by this case, is settled by Adamson v. The Auditor, &c., 9 Ind. R. 174. According to the agreed statement of facts, the tax was levied by the vote of the township. This could not be done. Had it been levied by the trustees after the vote, it [420]*420would have been good. That it was so levied, we cannot -infer from the statement in the record.

H. P. Biddle and B. W. Peters, for the appellant. N. O. Ross and R. P. Effinger, for the appellee.

The judgment is affirmed with costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

The question presented by this case, is settled by Adamson v. The Auditor, &c., 9 Ind. R. 174. According to the agreed statement of facts, the tax was levied by the vote of the township. This could not be done. Had it been levied by the trustees after the vote, it [420]*420would have been good. That it was so levied, we cannot -infer from the statement in the record.

H. P. Biddle and B. W. Peters, for the appellant. N. O. Ross and R. P. Effinger, for the appellee.

The judgment is affirmed with costs.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

11 Ind. 419, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/conwell-v-obrien-ind-1858.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack