Conwell v. Beaconway Stores, Inc. of Florida

189 So. 2d 799, 1966 Fla. LEXIS 3272
CourtSupreme Court of Florida
DecidedSeptember 14, 1966
DocketNo. 35398
StatusPublished

This text of 189 So. 2d 799 (Conwell v. Beaconway Stores, Inc. of Florida) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Conwell v. Beaconway Stores, Inc. of Florida, 189 So. 2d 799, 1966 Fla. LEXIS 3272 (Fla. 1966).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

By petition for a writ of certiorari we have for review an order of the Florida Industrial Commission bearing date March 22, 1966.

We find that oral argument would serve no useful purpose and it is therefore dispensed with pursuant to Florida Appellate Rule 3.10, subd. e, 31 F.S.A.

Our consideration of the petition, the record and briefs leads us to conclude that there has been no deviation from the essential requirements of law.

The petition is therefore denied.

The petition for allowance of attorney’s fees is also denied.

THORNAL, C. J., and DREW, O’CON-NELL, CALDWELL and ERVIN, JJ„ concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
189 So. 2d 799, 1966 Fla. LEXIS 3272, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/conwell-v-beaconway-stores-inc-of-florida-fla-1966.