Conway v. Town of Wilton
667 A.2d 1271, 235 Conn. 934, 1995 Conn. LEXIS 451
Opinion
The plaintiffs petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 39 Conn. App. 280 (AC 13524), is granted, limited to the following issues:
“1. Should this court reconsider its holding in Manning v. Barenz, 221 Conn. 256 (1992), that the recreational land use statute, General Statutes § 52-557f et seq., applies to municipalities?
“2. If the answer to the first question is no, did the Appellate Court improperly conclude that the trial court was correct in rendering summary judgment in favor of the defendant Connecticut Association of Secondary Schools (CASS), where the plaintiff claimed that CASS owed a duty to the plaintiff independent of any duty it [935] may have owed as an ‘owner of land’ within the meaning of the recreational land use statute?”
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Conway v. Town of Wilton, 667 A.2d 1271, 235 Conn. 934, 1995 Conn. LEXIS 451 (Colo. 1995).
667 A.2d 1271 (Conway v. Town of Wilton) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Luce v. City of West Haven
680 A.2d 259 (Supreme Court of Connecticut, 1996)
Conway v. Town of Wilton
680 A.2d 242 (Supreme Court of Connecticut, 1996)