Conway v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma

Conway v. State

1915 OK CR 242, 151 P. 1197, 12 Okla. Crim. 601, 1917 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 229

CourtCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma

DecidedSeptember 25, 1917

DocketNo. A-2383.

StatusPublished

This text of 1915 OK CR 242 (Conway v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Conway v. State, 1915 OK CR 242, 151 P. 1197, 12 Okla. Crim. 601, 1917 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 229 (Okla. Ct. App. 1917).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The plaintiff in error was- convicted on an information charging that he did have the unlawful possession of intoxicating liquors, with the unlawful intent to violate the prohibitory laws of the state, and was sentenced to be confined in the county jail for thirty days and to pay a fine of $50.00. Prom the judgment, an appeal was taken by filing in this court on December 30, 1914, a -petition in error with case-made.

*602 No briefs have been filed, and no appearance made on behalf of the plaintiff in error when the ease was called for final submission. The motion of the Attorney General to affirm the judgment for failure to prosecute the appeal is therefore affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

The plaintiff in error was- convicted on an information charging that he did have the unlawful possession of intoxicating liquors, with the unlawful intent to violate the prohibitory laws of the state, and was sentenced to be confined in the county jail for thirty days and to pay a fine of $50.00. Prom the judgment, an appeal was taken by filing in this court on December 30, 1914, a -petition in error with case-made.

*602 No briefs have been filed, and no appearance made on behalf of the plaintiff in error when the ease was called for final submission. The motion of the Attorney General to affirm the judgment for failure to prosecute the appeal is therefore affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

1915 OK CR 242, 151 P. 1197, 12 Okla. Crim. 601, 1917 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 229, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/conway-v-state-oklacrimapp-1917.