Conway v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals

Conway v. State

401 S.W.3d 579, 2013 WL 3146865, 2013 Mo. App. LEXIS 734

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided June 18, 2013·No. No. ED 98558·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Quincell Conway (“Movant”) appeals from the judgment of the motion court denying his Rule 24.035 motion for post-conviction relief without an evidentiary hearing.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal. The findings and conclusions of the motion court are based on findings of fact that are not clearly erroneous. An opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law would have no precedential value. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum, for their information only, setting forth the reasons for our decision.

We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Quincell Conway (“Movant”) appeals from the judgment of the motion court denying his Rule 24.035 motion for post-conviction relief without an evidentiary hearing.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal. The findings and conclusions of the motion court are based on findings of fact that are not clearly erroneous. An opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law would have no precedential value. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum, for their information only, setting forth the reasons for our decision.

We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Conway v. State, 401 S.W.3d 579, 2013 WL 3146865, 2013 Mo. App. LEXIS 734 (Mo. Ct. App. 2013).

Pincite

401 S.W.3d 579 (Conway v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.