Conway v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals

Conway v. State

342 S.W.3d 931, 2011 Mo. App. LEXIS 922, 2011 WL 2620442

CourtMissouri Court of Appeals

DecidedJuly 5, 2011

DocketED 95626

StatusPublished

This text of 342 S.W.3d 931 (Conway v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Conway v. State, 342 S.W.3d 931, 2011 Mo. App. LEXIS 922, 2011 WL 2620442 (Mo. Ct. App. 2011).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Paul Conway appeals the judgment denying his Rule 24.035 motion for post-conviction relief without an evidentiary hearing. We find that the motion court’s findings of fact and conclusions of law are not clearly erroneous. An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided the parties a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision. We affirm the judgment under Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Paul Conway appeals the judgment denying his Rule 24.035 motion for post-conviction relief without an evidentiary hearing. We find that the motion court’s findings of fact and conclusions of law are not clearly erroneous. An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided the parties a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision. We affirm the judgment under Rule 84.16(b).

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

342 S.W.3d 931, 2011 Mo. App. LEXIS 922, 2011 WL 2620442, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/conway-v-state-moctapp-2011.