Conway v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals

Conway v. State

342 S.W.3d 931, 2011 Mo. App. LEXIS 922, 2011 WL 2620442

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided July 5, 2011·No. ED 95626·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Paul Conway appeals the judgment denying his Rule 24.035 motion for post-conviction relief without an evidentiary hearing. We find that the motion court’s findings of fact and conclusions of law are not clearly erroneous. An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided the parties a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision. We affirm the judgment under Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Paul Conway appeals the judgment denying his Rule 24.035 motion for post-conviction relief without an evidentiary hearing. We find that the motion court’s findings of fact and conclusions of law are not clearly erroneous. An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided the parties a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision. We affirm the judgment under Rule 84.16(b).

Conway v. State, 342 S.W.3d 931, 2011 Mo. App. LEXIS 922, 2011 WL 2620442 (Mo. Ct. App. 2011).

Pincite

342 S.W.3d 931 (Conway v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.