Conway v. State ex rel. Department of Human Resources

Supreme Court of Alabama

Conway v. State ex rel. Department of Human Resources

720 So. 2d 889, 1998 Ala. LEXIS 197

CourtSupreme Court of Alabama

DecidedJuly 31, 1998

Docket1960770

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 720 So. 2d 889 (Conway v. State ex rel. Department of Human Resources) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Alabama primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Conway v. State ex rel. Department of Human Resources, 720 So. 2d 889, 1998 Ala. LEXIS 197 (Ala. 1998).

Pincite

Opinions

SEE, Justice.

The Court of Civil Appeals affirmed the judgment of the trial court in this paternity ease without an opinion. Conway v. State ex rel. Department of Human Resources, 696 So.2d 1091 (Ma.1996) (table). In light of Ex parte Jenkins, [Ms. 1961520, July 17, 1998] — So.2d (Ma.1998), we quash the writ as improvidently granted. We express no opinion as to whether the petitioner would be entitled to relief under Rule 60(b)(6), Aa. R. Civ. P., as that rule was interpreted in Jen[890]*890kins, because the petitioner has yet to make a Rule 60(b)(6) motion to the trial court.

WRIT QUASHED.

HOOPER, C.J., and ALMON, SHORES, HOUSTON, KENNEDY, and LYONS, JJ., concur. COOK, J., concurs in the result. MADDOX, J., dissents.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

SEE, Justice.

The Court of Civil Appeals affirmed the judgment of the trial court in this paternity ease without an opinion. Conway v. State ex rel. Department of Human Resources, 696 So.2d 1091 (Ma.1996) (table). In light of Ex parte Jenkins, [Ms. 1961520, July 17, 1998] — So.2d (Ma.1998), we quash the writ as improvidently granted. We express no opinion as to whether the petitioner would be entitled to relief under Rule 60(b)(6), Aa. R. Civ. P., as that rule was interpreted in Jen[890]*890kins, because the petitioner has yet to make a Rule 60(b)(6) motion to the trial court.

WRIT QUASHED.

HOOPER, C.J., and ALMON, SHORES, HOUSTON, KENNEDY, and LYONS, JJ., concur. COOK, J., concurs in the result. MADDOX, J., dissents.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

720 So. 2d 889, 1998 Ala. LEXIS 197, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/conway-v-state-ex-rel-department-of-human-resources-ala-1998.

Opinions

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack