Conway v. State ex rel. Department of Human Resources

720 So. 2d 889, 1998 Ala. LEXIS 197
Supreme Court of Alabama·Decided July 31, 1998·No. 1960770·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinions

SEE, Justice.

The Court of Civil Appeals affirmed the judgment of the trial court in this paternity ease without an opinion. Conway v. State ex rel. Department of Human Resources, 696 So.2d 1091 (Ma.1996) (table). In light of Ex parte Jenkins, [Ms. 1961520, July 17, 1998] — So.2d (Ma.1998), we quash the writ as improvidently granted. We express no opinion as to whether the petitioner would be entitled to relief under Rule 60(b)(6), Aa. R. Civ. P., as that rule was interpreted in Jen[890] kins, because the petitioner has yet to make a Rule 60(b)(6) motion to the trial court.

WRIT QUASHED.

HOOPER, C.J., and ALMON, SHORES, HOUSTON, KENNEDY, and LYONS, JJ., concur. COOK, J., concurs in the result. MADDOX, J., dissents.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Conway v. State ex rel. Department of Human Resources, 720 So. 2d 889, 1998 Ala. LEXIS 197 (Ala. 1998).

720 So. 2d 889 (Conway v. State ex rel. Department of Human Resources) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Ex Parte Conway
720 So. 2d 889 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1998)