Conway v. Rouse

• Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
• Decided: November 9, 2010
• Docket: 10-6996
• Status: Unpublished

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 10-6996

DANNY CONWAY,

Plaintiff – Appellant,

v.

NANCY ROUSE; J. MICHAEL STOUFFEL; J. DIEHL; D. FORSHEY; R. MILLER; E. FISCHER; P. K. JACKSON,

Defendants – Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. Richard D. Bennett, District Judge. (1:09-cv-00514-RDB)

Submitted: October 29, 2010 Decided: November 9, 2010

Before DUNCAN, AGEE, and KEENAN, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Danny Conway, Appellant Pro Se. Rex Schultz Gordon, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF MARYLAND, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Danny Conway appeals the district court’s order

denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint. We

have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.

Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district

court. Conway v. Rouse, No. 1:09-cv-00514-RDB (D. Md.

June 16, 2010). We dispense with oral argument because the

facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the

materials before the court and argument would not aid the

decisional process.

AFFIRMED