Conway v. Prince Frederick

1 Rec. V.A. Ct. (R.I.) 500
CourtRhode Island Vice Admiralty Court
DecidedJuly 1, 1749
StatusPublished

This text of 1 Rec. V.A. Ct. (R.I.) 500 (Conway v. Prince Frederick) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Rhode Island Vice Admiralty Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Conway v. Prince Frederick, 1 Rec. V.A. Ct. (R.I.) 500 (R.I. Super. Ct. 1749).

Opinion

Jonathan Nichols, and others owners of the Brigantine Prince Frederick whereof was late Master Elisha Johnson, come into Court, defend, and say, that the said Andrew Conway the Appellant deserted the service of the Voyage before the same was ended by Leaving said Vessel at a place called Leogan in the West Indies, and therefore by the Law Marine, he hath forfeited his Wages, that might otherwise have been due and of this they pray Judgement.

J. Honeyman

Appeared the Appellant Andrew Conwy this Eighth Day of May at Eleven o Clock withdrew the Libel

Andrew Conway

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
1 Rec. V.A. Ct. (R.I.) 500, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/conway-v-prince-frederick-riviceadmct-1749.