Conway v. Naylor
This text of 166 A.D. 904 (Conway v. Naylor) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Judgment and order reversed and newtrial granted, costs to abide the event. The evidence clearly shows plaintiff to have been negligent. He himself set up the collar with the projecting setscrews and connected the shafting, erected the platform on which he stood, and decided how high he would build it. He was fully aware of the dangers from these revolving screws catching his clothing. He was not relieved from taking care because told to have the job finished that day. In order to measure the space above this collar plaintiff admits standing about a foot from this shafting. He was free to determine for himself his position. (Bourdon v. Plaza Operating Co., 160 App. Div. 768). Apparently an inadvertent step brought his clothing into contact — an act for which he has only himself to blame. Jenks, P. J., Burr, Thomas, Rich and Putnam, JJ., concurred.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
166 A.D. 904, 150 N.Y.S. 1082, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/conway-v-naylor-nyappdiv-1914.