Conway v. Healthfirst Inc.
Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
PATRICK CONWAY, Plaintiff, No. 21-cv-6512 (RA) v. ORDER HEALTHFIRST INC. ET AL.,
Defendant.
RONNIE ABRAMS, United States District Judge: It has been reported to the Court that this case has been settled. Accordingly, it is hereby: ORDERED that the above-captioned action is discontinued without costs to any party and without prejudice to restoring the action to this Court’s docket if the application to restore the action 1s made within sixty (60) days. Any application to reopen this action must be filed within sixty (60) days of this order, and any application filed thereafter may be denied solely on that basis. If the parties seek to have the Court retain jurisdiction to enforce a settlement agreement, the terms of the agreement must be placed on the public record and “so ordered” by the Court within the same thirty-day period. See Hendrickson v. United States, 791 F.3d 354, 358 (2d Cir. 2015). The Clerk of Court is respectfully directed to close this case.
SO ORDERED. Dated: November 14, 2023 New York, New York Z Hon. Ronnie Abrams United States District Judge
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Conway v. Healthfirst Inc. (Conway v. Healthfirst Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.