Conway v. Farish-Stafford Co.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Conway v. Farish-Stafford Co.

166 A.D. 941

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJanuary 15, 1915

StatusPublished

This text of 166 A.D. 941 (Conway v. Farish-Stafford Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Conway v. Farish-Stafford Co., 166 A.D. 941 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1915).

Pincite

Opinion

Inasmuch as there was no effective stipulation, the compensation of the referee must be limited to the legal rate prescribed by section 3296 of the Code of Civil Procedure. Order reversed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and proceeding remitted to the clerk of the county of Queens for the retaxation of plaintiff’s costs, upon notice. Jenks, P. J., Burr, Thomas, Rich and Putnam, JJ., concurred.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Inasmuch as there was no effective stipulation, the compensation of the referee must be limited to the legal rate prescribed by section 3296 of the Code of Civil Procedure. Order reversed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and proceeding remitted to the clerk of the county of Queens for the retaxation of plaintiff’s costs, upon notice. Jenks, P. J., Burr, Thomas, Rich and Putnam, JJ., concurred.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

166 A.D. 941, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/conway-v-farish-stafford-co-nyappdiv-1915.