Conway v. BOROUGH OF FLORHAM PARK

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Conway v. BOROUGH OF FLORHAM PARK

13 A.3d 359, 205 N.J. 94, 2011 N.J. LEXIS 225

CourtSupreme Court of New Jersey

DecidedFebruary 7, 2011

DocketA-106/107 September Term 2009, 065873

StatusPublished

This text of 13 A.3d 359 (Conway v. BOROUGH OF FLORHAM PARK) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Jersey primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Conway v. BOROUGH OF FLORHAM PARK, 13 A.3d 359, 205 N.J. 94, 2011 N.J. LEXIS 225 (N.J. 2011).

Pincite

Opinion

This matter having been brought before the Court on the parties’ petition and cross-petition for certification;

And the Court having granted the petition and cross-petition by Orders filed July 12, 2010, and having heard argument of the parties on November 9, 2010, and having determined that plaintiffs complaint, captioned as an action in lieu of prerogative writs, is untimely and that the appeal can and should be disposed of summarily; it is hereby

ORDERED that the judgment of the Superior Court, Appellate Division in A-2323-08T1 is vacated, and the matter is remanded to the Superior Court, Law Division, for the entry of judgment dismissing plaintiffs complaint.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

This matter having been brought before the Court on the parties’ petition and cross-petition for certification;

And the Court having granted the petition and cross-petition by Orders filed July 12, 2010, and having heard argument of the parties on November 9, 2010, and having determined that plaintiffs complaint, captioned as an action in lieu of prerogative writs, is untimely and that the appeal can and should be disposed of summarily; it is hereby

ORDERED that the judgment of the Superior Court, Appellate Division in A-2323-08T1 is vacated, and the matter is remanded to the Superior Court, Law Division, for the entry of judgment dismissing plaintiffs complaint.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

13 A.3d 359, 205 N.J. 94, 2011 N.J. LEXIS 225, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/conway-v-borough-of-florham-park-nj-2011.