Conway v. Barber

6 Misc. 627, 27 N.Y.S. 136, 58 N.Y. St. Rep. 12
CourtCity of New York Municipal Court
DecidedJanuary 15, 1894
StatusPublished

This text of 6 Misc. 627 (Conway v. Barber) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering City of New York Municipal Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Conway v. Barber, 6 Misc. 627, 27 N.Y.S. 136, 58 N.Y. St. Rep. 12 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1894).

Opinion

Fitzsimons, J.

The only exception taken is found at folio 36 of the case on appeal. It cannot avail appellants, because [628]*628the conversation objected to was communicated to one of the defendants and he made answer thereto. It was, therefore, admissible.

The plaintiff, according to his testimony, was entitled to-commissions upon the coal sold by him; as to the alleged settlement claimed by defendants that claim is disputed by the plaintiff. He says that he accepted the forty-two dollars paid him under protest. Under these circumstances the fact that lie-signed a receipt in full for all commission, and defendants’ contention that his commission amounted only to forty-two dollars does not preclude him from recovering the sum due him.

The verdict is amply sustained by the evidence, and is not, contrary to law, and is, therefore, affirmed, with costs.

Newburg-er and McCarthy, JJ., concur.

Judgment affirmed, with costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
6 Misc. 627, 27 N.Y.S. 136, 58 N.Y. St. Rep. 12, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/conway-v-barber-nynyccityct-1894.