Conway v. Aluminum & Brass Co.

107 N.E.2d 73, 304 N.Y. 571
CourtNew York Court of Appeals
DecidedMay 29, 1952
StatusPublished

This text of 107 N.E.2d 73 (Conway v. Aluminum & Brass Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Conway v. Aluminum & Brass Co., 107 N.E.2d 73, 304 N.Y. 571 (N.Y. 1952).

Opinion

304 N.Y. 571 (1952)

In the Matter of the Claim of John W. Conway, Respondent,
v.
Aluminum & Brass Company et al., Respondents, and Special Disability Fund, Appellant. Workmen's Compensation Board, Respondent.

Court of Appeals of the State of New York.

Argued April 21, 1952.
Decided May 29, 1952

John M. Cullen for appellant.

Nathaniel L. Goldstein, Attorney-General (Daniel Polansky, Wendell P. Brown and Roy Wiedersum of counsel), for Workmen's Compensation Board, respondent.

Concur: LOUGHRAN, Ch. J., LEWIS, CONWAY, DESMOND, DYE, FULD and FROESSEL, JJ.

Order affirmed, with costs; no opinion.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Claim of Conway v. Aluminum & Brass Co.
107 N.E.2d 73 (New York Court of Appeals, 1952)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
107 N.E.2d 73, 304 N.Y. 571, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/conway-v-aluminum-brass-co-ny-1952.