Conviser v. Vano
This text of 4 A.D.2d 965 (Conviser v. Vano) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
In an action by the purchasers of real property against the sellers to recover damages for breach of warranty and fraud because of the collapse of a retaining wall following a rainstorm, the appeal is from a judgment, entered on a jury verdict dismissing the second amended complaint. Judgment unanimously affirmed, with costs. No opinion. Present — Beldock, Acting P. J., Murphy, Ughetta, Hallinan and Kleinfeld, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
4 A.D.2d 965, 168 N.Y.S.2d 611, 1957 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3841, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/conviser-v-vano-nyappdiv-1957.