Convertino v. Convertino
This text of 179 A.D.2d 999 (Convertino v. Convertino) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Memorandum: Family Court properly dismissed petitioner’s application for an upward modification of respondent’s support obligation, as set forth in the separation agreement that was incorporated but not merged into the judgment of divorce, because petitioner failed to establish an unanticipated and unreasonable change in circumstances and a concomitant need (see, Matter of Boden v Boden, 42 NY2d 210, 213). (Appeal from Order of Oneida County Family Court, Flemma, J. — Modify Support.) Present — Denman, P. J., Boomer, Green, Pine and Davis, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
179 A.D.2d 999, 580 N.Y.S.2d 912, 1992 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2322, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/convertino-v-convertino-nyappdiv-1992.