Converse v. the Aetna National Bank
This text of 76 A. 1117 (Converse v. the Aetna National Bank) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Connecticut primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Judgment for the respective defendants in the above-entitled causes having been reversed by the Supreme Court of the United States (212 U. S. 567), this court, on March 4th, 1909, found error in the record, judgment and proceedings of the Superior Court in and for Hartford County (see 79 Conn. 163, 603), whereupon “it is considered and adjudged that said judgment be set aside and said cause be and is hereby remanded to said Superior Court, there to be proceeded with conformably to said opinion, judgment and mandate of said Supreme Court of the United States and the Constitution and laws of the United States and of this State; and that the plaintiff recover of the defendant $ costs of suit.”
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
76 A. 1117, 82 Conn. 702, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/converse-v-the-aetna-national-bank-conn-1910.