Converse v. the Aetna National Bank

76 A. 1117, 82 Conn. 702
Supreme Court of Connecticut·Decided July 5, 1910·Published·Cited by 5 cases

Opinion

Judgment for the respective defendants in the above-entitled causes having been reversed by the Supreme Court of the United States (212 U. S. 567), this court, on March 4th, 1909, found error in the record, judgment and proceedings of the Superior Court in and for Hartford County (see 79 Conn. 163, 603), whereupon “it is considered and adjudged that said judgment be set aside and said cause be and is hereby remanded to said Superior Court, there to be proceeded with conformably to said opinion, judgment and mandate of said Supreme Court of the United States and the Constitution and laws of the United States and of this State; and that the plaintiff recover of the defendant $ costs of suit.”

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Converse v. the Aetna National Bank, 76 A. 1117, 82 Conn. 702 (Colo. 1910).

76 A. 1117 (Converse v. the Aetna National Bank) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Reynolds v. Willis
209 A.2d 760 (Supreme Court of Delaware, 1965)
O'Toole v. United States
242 F.2d 308 (Third Circuit, 1957)
Jones v. Pennsylvania Railroad Company
123 A.2d 111 (Superior Court of Delaware, 1956)
Broderick v. McGuire
174 A. 314 (Supreme Court of Connecticut, 1934)