Converse v. . Stewart
85 N.E. 1107, 192 N.Y. 578, 1908 N.Y. LEXIS 996
Opinion
Judgment affirmed, with costs, on the ground that the proof fails to establish that defendant was a stockholder of the thresher company at the time of its dissolution and of the decree of the Minnesota courts; no opinion.
Concur: Cullen, Ch. J., Gray, Haight, Vann, Werner, Willard Bartlett and Chase, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Converse v. . Stewart, 85 N.E. 1107, 192 N.Y. 578, 1908 N.Y. LEXIS 996 (N.Y. 1908).
85 N.E. 1107 (Converse v. . Stewart) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Hood v. Guaranty Trust Co.
243 A.D. 470 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1935)
Pope v. Heckscher
194 N.E. 53 (New York Court of Appeals, 1934)