Convatec Technologies Inc. v. Smith & Nephew, Inc.
This text of Convatec Technologies Inc. v. Smith & Nephew, Inc. (Convatec Technologies Inc. v. Smith & Nephew, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential.
United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit ______________________
CONVATEC TECHNOLOGIES INC., Appellant
v.
SMITH & NEPHEW, INC., Appellee ______________________
2014-1822, 2014-1823 ______________________
Appeals from the United States Patent and Trade- mark Office, Patent Trial and Appeal Board in Nos. IPR2013-00097, IPR2013-00102. ______________________
JUDGMENT ______________________
RICHARD TORCZON, Wilson, Sonsini, Goodrich & Rosati, PC, Washington, DC, argued for appellant. Also represented by JEFFREY WILLIAM GUISE, PETER R. MUNSON, LORELEI PEREZ WESTIN, San Diego, CA.
BRADLEY THOMAS LENNIE, Hunton & Williams LLP, Washington, DC, argued for appellee. Also represented by JEFFREY B. VOCKRODT, CHRISTOPHER H. YAEN; DAVID A. KELLY, Atlanta, GA. MONICA BARNES LATEEF, Office of the Solictor, United States Patent and Trademark Office, Alexandria, VA, argued for intervenor Michelle K. Lee. Also represented by NATHAN K. KELLEY, SCOTT WEIDENFELLER. ______________________
THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is
ORDERED and ADJUDGED:
PER CURIAM (CHEN, LINN, and HUGHES, Circuit Judg- es). AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.
ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT
August 10, 2015 /s/ Daniel E. O’Toole Date Daniel E. O’Toole Clerk of Court
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Convatec Technologies Inc. v. Smith & Nephew, Inc., Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/convatec-technologies-inc-v-smith-nephew-inc-cafc-2015.