Controlled Weather of Penn. Corp. v. Contel Construction Corp.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Controlled Weather of Penn. Corp. v. Contel Construction Corp.

33 A.D.2d 547, 304 N.Y.S.2d 587, 1969 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3002

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedOctober 23, 1969

StatusPublished

This text of 33 A.D.2d 547 (Controlled Weather of Penn. Corp. v. Contel Construction Corp.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Controlled Weather of Penn. Corp. v. Contel Construction Corp., 33 A.D.2d 547, 304 N.Y.S.2d 587, 1969 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3002 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1969).

Pincite

Opinion

Order entered February 17, 1969, unanimously affirmed, without costs and without disbursements. Inasmuch as the defendant Aetna Casualty and Surety Co. has stipulated to become a party to the Pennsylvania action and the plaintiff may obtain full relief in such action, we are affirming the dismissal of this action brought subsequently in this State. The circumstances justify the dismissal and a pendency' of this action, with a stay thereof, is not required for the protection of the rights of the plaintiff. Concur- — -Stevens, P. J., Eager, Tilzer, McNally and Bastow, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Order entered February 17, 1969, unanimously affirmed, without costs and without disbursements. Inasmuch as the defendant Aetna Casualty and Surety Co. has stipulated to become a party to the Pennsylvania action and the plaintiff may obtain full relief in such action, we are affirming the dismissal of this action brought subsequently in this State. The circumstances justify the dismissal and a pendency' of this action, with a stay thereof, is not required for the protection of the rights of the plaintiff. Concur- — -Stevens, P. J., Eager, Tilzer, McNally and Bastow, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

33 A.D.2d 547, 304 N.Y.S.2d 587, 1969 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3002, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/controlled-weather-of-penn-corp-v-contel-construction-corp-nyappdiv-1969.