Control Specialties v. Armstrong
This text of 963 F.2d 386 (Control Specialties v. Armstrong) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
963 F.2d 386
Control Specialties
v.
Armstrong
NO. 91-8611
United States Court of Appeals,
Eleventh Circuit.
May 06, 1992
Appeal From: N.D.Ga.
AFFIRMED
Federal Reporter. The Eleventh Circuit provides by rule that
unpublished opinions are not considered binding precedent.
They may be cited as persuasive authority, provided that a
copy of the unpublished opinion is attached to or
incorporated within the brief, petition or motion. Eleventh
ircuit Rules, Rule 36-2, 28 U.S.C.A.)
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
963 F.2d 386, 1992 WL 104265, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/control-specialties-v-armstrong-ca11-1992.