Contreras v. State
92 S.W.2d 1030, 130 Tex. Crim. 100, 1936 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 113
Opinions
The offense is theft of property over the value of fifty dollars; the punishment, confinement in the penitentiary for two years.
We are not warranted in considering the statement of facts as it bears no certificate showing the approval of the trial judge. Vicera v. State, 27 S. W. (2d) 545.
*101 No bills of exception are brought forward.
The judgment is affirmed.
The foregoing opinion of the Commission of Appeals has been examined by the Judges of the Court of Criminal Appeals and approved by the Court.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Contreras v. State, 92 S.W.2d 1030, 130 Tex. Crim. 100, 1936 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 113 (Tex. 1936).
92 S.W.2d 1030 (Contreras v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Sullivan v. State
701 S.W.2d 905 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1986)