Contreras v. Davis

597 F. App'x 175
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
DecidedMarch 16, 2015
DocketNo. 14-6045
StatusPublished

This text of 597 F. App'x 175 (Contreras v. Davis) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Contreras v. Davis, 597 F. App'x 175 (4th Cir. 2015).

Opinion

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Jason Michael Contreras appeals the district court’s order dismissing his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (2012)- petition raising a claim under Miller v. Alabama, — U.S. -, 132 S.Ct. 2455, 183 L.Ed.2d 407 (2012). We previously granted a certificate of appealability on the issue of whethr er the district court erred in dismissing the petition as untimely, and we placed the appeal in abeyance pending a decision in Johnson v. Ponton, 780 F.3d 219, 2015 WL 924049 (4th Cir. Mar. 5, 2015). In Johnson, the Court held that the Miller rule is not retroactively applicable to cases on collateral review. Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s order. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Miller v. Alabama
132 S. Ct. 2455 (Supreme Court, 2012)
Shermaine Johnson v. Henry Ponton
780 F.3d 219 (Fourth Circuit, 2015)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
597 F. App'x 175, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/contreras-v-davis-ca4-2015.