Contreras v. Davis
This text of 597 F. App'x 175 (Contreras v. Davis) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
Jason Michael Contreras appeals the district court’s order dismissing his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (2012)- petition raising a claim under Miller v. Alabama, — U.S. -, 132 S.Ct. 2455, 183 L.Ed.2d 407 (2012). We previously granted a certificate of appealability on the issue of whethr er the district court erred in dismissing the petition as untimely, and we placed the appeal in abeyance pending a decision in Johnson v. Ponton, 780 F.3d 219, 2015 WL 924049 (4th Cir. Mar. 5, 2015). In Johnson, the Court held that the Miller rule is not retroactively applicable to cases on collateral review. Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s order. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
597 F. App'x 175, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/contreras-v-davis-ca4-2015.