Contreras v. Commissioner of Social Security

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Contreras v. Commissioner of Social Security. Read the opinion of the Court — 239 F. Supp. 3d 203
District Court, District of Columbia·Decided March 9, 2017·No. Civil Action No. 2015-1277·Published

Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

) RICARDO A. CONTRERAS, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) Case No. 15-cv-1277 (TSC) (DAR) ) COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY, ) ) Defendant. ) )

ORDER

Upon careful consideration of the record in this case, the Magistrate Judge’s Report and

Recommendation filed on Feb. 17, 2017 (ECF No. 28), and the absence of any objections from

either party thereto, the court hereby ADOPTS the Report of the Magistrate Judge and further

ACCEPTS the Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge. It is therefore ORDERED that

Plaintiff’s Motion for Judgment of Reversal (ECF No. 22) is GRANTED IN PART and

Defendant’s Motion for Judgment of Affirmance (ECF No. 23) is DENIED.

It is FURTHER ORDERED that this matter is remanded to the Social Security

Administration for further administrative proceedings consistent with the Magistrate Judge’s

Report and Recommendation.

Date: March 9, 2017

Tanya S. Chutkan TANYA S. CHUTKAN United States District Judge

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Contreras v. Commissioner of Social Security, (D.D.C. 2017).

Contreras v. Commissioner of Social Security (Contreras v. Commissioner of Social Security) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.