Contreras, Jonasz & Camacho, P.A. v. Fernandez

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Contreras, Jonasz & Camacho, P.A. v. Fernandez

45 So. 3d 975, 2010 Fla. App. LEXIS 15553, 2010 WL 3984696

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedOctober 13, 2010

Docket3D10-2201

StatusPublished

This text of 45 So. 3d 975 (Contreras, Jonasz & Camacho, P.A. v. Fernandez) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Contreras, Jonasz & Camacho, P.A. v. Fernandez, 45 So. 3d 975, 2010 Fla. App. LEXIS 15553, 2010 WL 3984696 (Fla. Ct. App. 2010).

Pincite

Opinion

SCHWARTZ, Senior Judge.

Because the wife’s former counsel has demonstrated a clear, unqualified right to the prompt hearing and determination of its application for the adjudication of a charging lien on her recovery in this matrimonial action (as well as of the motion to dismiss that application), see Sinclair, Louis, Siegel, Heath, Nussbaum & Zavertnik, P.A. v. Baucom, 428 So.2d 1383, 1385 (Fla.1983), the petition for mandamus to require that relief is granted. Flagship Nat’l Bank of Miami v. Testa, 429 So.2d 69 (Fla. 3d DCA 1983); Garcia v. Garcia, 958 So.2d 947, 949 (Fla. 3d DCA 2007); Haas v. Spiegel, 772 So.2d 539, 540 (Fla. 3d DCA 1997); Quintana v. Barad, 528 So.2d 1300 (Fla. 3d DCA 1988); Villas at Cutler Ridge Homeowners’ Ass’n v. Newman, 498 So.2d 579 (Fla. 3d DCA 1986). Of course, we express no opinion as to the merits of the controversy and are certain that it will be unnecessary to issue the formal writ.

Mandamus granted.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

SCHWARTZ, Senior Judge.

Because the wife’s former counsel has demonstrated a clear, unqualified right to the prompt hearing and determination of its application for the adjudication of a charging lien on her recovery in this matrimonial action (as well as of the motion to dismiss that application), see Sinclair, Louis, Siegel, Heath, Nussbaum & Zavertnik, P.A. v. Baucom, 428 So.2d 1383, 1385 (Fla.1983), the petition for mandamus to require that relief is granted. Flagship Nat’l Bank of Miami v. Testa, 429 So.2d 69 (Fla. 3d DCA 1983); Garcia v. Garcia, 958 So.2d 947, 949 (Fla. 3d DCA 2007); Haas v. Spiegel, 772 So.2d 539, 540 (Fla. 3d DCA 1997); Quintana v. Barad, 528 So.2d 1300 (Fla. 3d DCA 1988); Villas at Cutler Ridge Homeowners’ Ass’n v. Newman, 498 So.2d 579 (Fla. 3d DCA 1986). Of course, we express no opinion as to the merits of the controversy and are certain that it will be unnecessary to issue the formal writ.

Mandamus granted.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

45 So. 3d 975, 2010 Fla. App. LEXIS 15553, 2010 WL 3984696, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/contreras-jonasz-camacho-pa-v-fernandez-fladistctapp-2010.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack