Contrera v. FLORIDA UNEMPLOYMENT APPEALS COMMISSION
This text of 893 So. 2d 609 (Contrera v. FLORIDA UNEMPLOYMENT APPEALS COMMISSION) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Thomas E. CONTRERA, Appellant,
v.
FLORIDA UNEMPLOYMENT APPEALS COMMISSION, Appellee.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.
Appellant, pro se, for Appellant.
John D. Maher, Deputy General Counsel, Unemployment Appeals Commission, Tallahassee, for Appellee.
WEBSTER, J.
In this appeal from an adverse final order of the Unemployment Appeals Commission, we have previously afforded appellant an opportunity to supplement the record with the transcript of the hearing held before the appeals referee. Contrera v. Fla. Unemployment Appeals Comm'n, 29 Fla. L. Weekly D2789, ___ So.2d ___, 2004 WL 2870073 (Fla. 1st DCA Dec.10, 2004). The time allotted has now run, and no supplemental record has been filed. Accordingly, as we warned in our prior opinion, we are constrained to affirm. Id. (citing Applegate v. Barnett Bank of Tallahassee, 377 So.2d 1150 (Fla.1979) for the proposition that, because decisions of lower tribunals are presumed to be correct, such a decision which rests on resolution of disputed issues of fact must be affirmed in the absence of a transcript of the evidentiary hearing or trial).
AFFIRMED.
WOLF, C.J. and BARFIELD, J., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
893 So. 2d 609, 2005 Fla. App. LEXIS 2125, 2005 WL 229865, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/contrera-v-florida-unemployment-appeals-commission-fladistctapp-2005.