Contracting Plumbers' Cooperative Restoration Corp. v. Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co.
This text of 387 N.E.2d 226 (Contracting Plumbers' Cooperative Restoration Corp. v. Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
OPINION OF THE COURT
Order affirmed, with costs, for the reasons stated in the memorandum at the Appellate Division (59 AD2d 921), noting *859 that it is conceded that Interboro never performed any paving operations at the situs of the accidents.
Concur: Chief Judge Cooke and Judges Jasen, Gabrielli, Jones, Wachtler and Fuchsberg.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
387 N.E.2d 226, 46 N.Y.2d 857, 414 N.Y.S.2d 515, 1979 N.Y. LEXIS 2569, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/contracting-plumbers-cooperative-restoration-corp-v-hartford-accident-ny-1979.