Contracting Plumbers' Cooperative Restoration Corp. v. Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co.
387 N.E.2d 226, 46 N.Y.2d 857, 414 N.Y.S.2d 515, 1979 N.Y. LEXIS 2569
Opinion
OPINION OF THE COURT
Order affirmed, with costs, for the reasons stated in the memorandum at the Appellate Division (59 AD2d 921), noting *859 that it is conceded that Interboro never performed any paving operations at the situs of the accidents.
Concur: Chief Judge Cooke and Judges Jasen, Gabrielli, Jones, Wachtler and Fuchsberg.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Contracting Plumbers' Cooperative Restoration Corp. v. Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co., 387 N.E.2d 226, 46 N.Y.2d 857, 414 N.Y.S.2d 515, 1979 N.Y. LEXIS 2569 (N.Y. 1979).
387 N.E.2d 226 (Contracting Plumbers' Cooperative Restoration Corp. v. Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Atlantic Mutual Insurance v. Terk Technologies Corp.
309 A.D.2d 22 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2003)
Board of Education v. Continental Insurance
198 A.D.2d 816 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1993)
Avondale Industries, Inc. v. Travelers Indemnity Co.
774 F. Supp. 1416 (S.D. New York, 1991)
County of Monroe v. Travelers Insurance Companies
100 Misc. 2d 41 (New York Supreme Court, 1979)