Contino v. Berger

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Contino v. Berger

825 So. 2d 1089, 2002 Fla. App. LEXIS 14232, 2002 WL 31174494

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedOctober 2, 2002

DocketNo. 3D02-1864

StatusPublished

This text of 825 So. 2d 1089 (Contino v. Berger) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Contino v. Berger, 825 So. 2d 1089, 2002 Fla. App. LEXIS 14232, 2002 WL 31174494 (Fla. Ct. App. 2002).

Pincite

Opinion

CONFESSION OF ERROR

PER CURIAM.

Based on appellee Terry Abrams Berger’s proper confession of error filed in this cause, we reverse the final judgment entered after default and remand the cause to the trial court for further proceedings consistent with Sanchez v. Brumm, 706 So.2d 886 (Fla. 3d DCA 1998)(due process requires notice and opportunity to be heard prior to the entry of judgment after default when damages claimed are unliquidated).

Reversed and remanded.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

CONFESSION OF ERROR

PER CURIAM.

Based on appellee Terry Abrams Berger’s proper confession of error filed in this cause, we reverse the final judgment entered after default and remand the cause to the trial court for further proceedings consistent with Sanchez v. Brumm, 706 So.2d 886 (Fla. 3d DCA 1998)(due process requires notice and opportunity to be heard prior to the entry of judgment after default when damages claimed are unliquidated).

Reversed and remanded.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

825 So. 2d 1089, 2002 Fla. App. LEXIS 14232, 2002 WL 31174494, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/contino-v-berger-fladistctapp-2002.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack