Contini v. Fonda, Johnstown & Gloversville Railroad

225 A.D. 752

Opinion

Seeger, J.

(dissenting). The appeal is from an order denying a motion for a change of venue, and from an order denying a motion for reargument of such motion. The original motion papers present a convincing argument for a change of venue upon the ground of convenience of witnesses. The motion is to change [753] the venue from a metropolitan county to a rural county, where a speedy trial can be had, and it should be granted for that reason. (Mills v. Sparrow, 131 App. Div. 241; Archer v. Mcllravy, 86 id. 512.) The change of venue is sought to the county where the accident happened and where the witnesses to the accident reside, and should be granted for that reason also. (Jacobs v. Davis, 65 App. Div. 144.)

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Contini v. Fonda, Johnstown & Gloversville Railroad, 225 A.D. 752 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1928).

225 A.D. 752 (Contini v. Fonda, Johnstown & Gloversville Railroad) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Jacobs v. Davis
65 A.D. 144 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1901)
Mills v. Sparrow
131 A.D. 241 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1909)