Continental/moss-Gordin, Inc. v. Ronald W. Harp, Joe I. Tarica and Kelley G. Laminack

386 F.2d 995
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit·Decided December 4, 1967·No. 24375·Published

Opinion

386 F.2d 995

CONTINENTAL/MOSS-GORDIN, INC., Appellant,
v.
Ronald W. HARP, Joe I. Tarica and Kelley G. Laminack, Appellees.

No. 24375.

United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit.

December 4, 1967.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of Alabama; Frank M. Johnson, Jr. J., 259 F. Supp. 198.

Calvin M. Whitesell, Montgomery, Ala., Robert I. Paller, Atlanta, Ga., Whitesell & Alton, Montgomery, Ala., and Smith, Cohen, Ringel, Kohler, Martin & Lowe, Atlanta, Ga., for appellant.

William S. Mooneyham, Montgomery, Ala., for appellees.

George D. Palmer, Atty., Dept. of Labor, Washington, D. C., Charles Donahue, Solicitor of Labor, Bessie Margolin, Associate Solicitor, Robert E. Nagle, Paul A. McKean, Attorneys, U. S. Department of Labor, Washington, D. C., Beverley R. Worrell, Regional Atty., amici curiae.

Before RIVES, GOLDBERG and DYER, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

The opinion and judgment of the district court are obviously correct under the authority of Foremost Dairies, Inc. v. Wirtz, 5 Cir. 1967, 381 F.2d 653.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Continental/moss-Gordin, Inc. v. Ronald W. Harp, Joe I. Tarica and Kelley G. Laminack, 386 F.2d 995 (5th Cir. 1967).

386 F.2d 995 (Continental/moss-Gordin, Inc. v. Ronald W. Harp, Joe I. Tarica and Kelley G. Laminack) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related