Continental/moss-Gordin, Inc. v. Ronald W. Harp, Joe I. Tarica and Kelley G. Laminack
This text of 386 F.2d 995 (Continental/moss-Gordin, Inc. v. Ronald W. Harp, Joe I. Tarica and Kelley G. Laminack) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
386 F.2d 995
CONTINENTAL/MOSS-GORDIN, INC., Appellant,
v.
Ronald W. HARP, Joe I. Tarica and Kelley G. Laminack, Appellees.
No. 24375.
United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit.
December 4, 1967.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of Alabama; Frank M. Johnson, Jr. J., 259 F. Supp. 198.
Calvin M. Whitesell, Montgomery, Ala., Robert I. Paller, Atlanta, Ga., Whitesell & Alton, Montgomery, Ala., and Smith, Cohen, Ringel, Kohler, Martin & Lowe, Atlanta, Ga., for appellant.
William S. Mooneyham, Montgomery, Ala., for appellees.
George D. Palmer, Atty., Dept. of Labor, Washington, D. C., Charles Donahue, Solicitor of Labor, Bessie Margolin, Associate Solicitor, Robert E. Nagle, Paul A. McKean, Attorneys, U. S. Department of Labor, Washington, D. C., Beverley R. Worrell, Regional Atty., amici curiae.
Before RIVES, GOLDBERG and DYER, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
The opinion and judgment of the district court are obviously correct under the authority of Foremost Dairies, Inc. v. Wirtz, 5 Cir. 1967, 381 F.2d 653.
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
386 F.2d 995, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/continentalmoss-gordin-inc-v-ronald-w-harp-joe-i-tarica-and-kelley-ca5-1967.